The Guam Housing and Urban Renewal Authority is pushing back against Dr. Joel Joseph’s bid for summary judgment, arguing it acted within its legal authority when it moved to condemn his Mangilao properties for a planned medical campus and related community projects. In recent court filings, GHURA maintained that, under Guam law, healthcare facilities fall within the scope of its “housing project” powers, which permit the use of eminent domain without the procedural steps required for urban renewal projects.
The dispute centers on two lots, totaling more than 55,000 square meters, that GHURA says are key to developing a new public hospital, healthcare facilities, and future affordable housing for veterans and the elderly. GHURA asserts it gained fee simple title to the properties in March after depositing $6.65 million in estimated compensation with the court, including $3.97 million allocated for Joseph’s lots
. The agency also cited failed purchase negotiations, claiming Joseph sought over 191% of the appraised value.
Joseph’s motion contends GHURA exceeded its authority and failed to meet statutory requirements, arguing that the agency can only condemn slum or blighted areas or must first complete an urban renewal plan. GHURA countered that this interpretation is too narrow, noting that “housing project” is defined in law to include health facilities, community centers, and related services. The agency further stressed that the only prerequisite for condemnation in this context is a resolution by its Board of Commissioners, which it adopted on Nov. 26, 2024.
GHURA has asked the Superior Court not only to reject Joseph’s motion but also to grant summary judgment in its favor. The agency says acquiring the land is vital for improving island-wide healthcare access, stimulating economic development, and providing attainable housing. The court has yet to rule on either side’s request.